Vážení zákazníci, v letošním roce budeme expedovat poslední objednávky ve středu 18. 12. 2024.

Těšíme se s vámi na shledanou od pondělí 06. 01. 2025.

 

Cena s DPH / bez DPH
Hlavní stránka>PD ISO/TR 16732-3:2013 Fire safety engineering. Fire risk assessment Example of an industrial property
Sponsored link
sklademVydáno: 2013-05-31
PD ISO/TR 16732-3:2013 Fire safety engineering. Fire risk assessment Example of an industrial property

PD ISO/TR 16732-3:2013

Fire safety engineering. Fire risk assessment Example of an industrial property

Formát
Dostupnost
Cena a měna
Anglicky Zabezpečené PDF
K okamžitému stažení
6820 Kč
Čtěte normu po dobu 1 hodiny. Více informací v kategorii E-READING
Čtení normy
na 1 hodinu
682.00 Kč
Čtěte normu po dobu 24 hodin. Více informací v kategorii E-READING
Čtení normy
na 24 hodin
2046.00 Kč
Anglicky Tisk
Skladem
6820 Kč
Označení normy:PD ISO/TR 16732-3:2013
Počet stran:32
Vydáno:2013-05-31
ISBN:978 0 580 80188 4
Status:Standard
Popis

PD ISO/TR 16732-3:2013


This standard PD ISO/TR 16732-3:2013 Fire safety engineering. Fire risk assessment is classified in these ICS categories:
  • 13.220.01 Protection against fire in general

This part of ISO/TR 16732 deals with a fictitious propane storage facility dedicated to the reception of propane transported by tank wagons, the storage of propane in a pressurized vessel and the bulk shipment of propane by tank trucks. The fire risk assessment developed in this part of ISO/TR 16732 is not intended to be exhaustive, but is given as an example to illustrate the application of ISO 16732-1 to an industrial facility.

The scope of this part of ISO/TR 16732 is further limited to design-phase strategies, including changes to the layout of the facility and selection of relevant fire safety strategies (implementation of risk reduction measures). Not included are strategies that operate during the operation phase, including process modifications.

This part of ISO/TR 16732 illustrates the value of fire risk assessment because multiple scenarios are analysed, and several design options are available, which may perform well or not depending on the considered scenario. Risk estimation is needed to determine the result of these different combinations, and overall measures of performance that can be compared between design options. If there were only one scenario of interest, or if the options all tended to perform the same way on all the scenarios, then a simpler type of engineering analysis would suffice.